There were things I never got through, though, as I was so backlogged by Tokyo that I leaped directly into finals and had no time to write anything but a lengthy complaint about how people look funny at me on the trains. SO. This will actually be totally disorganized and things I want to write down with no regard for order or whether or not I already talked about it!
KINKAKUJI:
There are two photos you are required by law to take if you visit Kyoto. At the city border they literally stop you and check if you have both of these images either on postcard or digital media, and if you have neither they don't let you leave (THIS IS NOT TRUE. But it might as well be, it's like visiting New York City without going to Times Square or visiting New Jersey without going to a landfill (oh wait that last one is literally impossible to do)).
One I have already posted, of Kiyomizudera. The second is Kinkakuji, where there is a pavilion which is gold, the Kinkaku They cleverly put a pond in front of it meaning that every bit of gold is doubled, like a corporate matching promise in a public television funding drive. The pavilion itself was made by one of the Ashikaga Shoguns so that he could have tea parties with his buddy, the abbot of the attached temple. As time passed, both the temple and the Ashikaga became less and less important- but a gold building is timeless. The Temple has a real name, but everyone calls it Kinkakuji, literally meaning 'the temple where the golden pavilion is.'
DIGRESSION: In Japanese, because there are no spaces until the end of a sentence, many times when there is a word that describes a proper noun it is directly attached when transliterated to english. This confuses us a lot. The most common example I've seen is rivers; I have seen many people talking about 'the Kamogawa river...' but 'kawa' means river, and in a compound it softens to 'gawa,' so you're saying the Kamo river river. In this particular case, 'kinkaku' is made up of kin = gold, and kaku = pavilion. Ji means temple, which is why every temple somehow has a ji at the end of it (the kanji can also be read dera, and alone it's tera- which is the word for temple in general- but I couldn't get a straight answer out of anyone as to why it's read ji at the end of some temples' names and dera at the end of others'. ). SO Kinkakuji (which I translate in my head to 'that temple where the sweet golden pavilion is') is what everyone calls the place because the Zen temple there is for chumps, and Kinkaku is the pavilion itself. Just thought I'd straighten everyone out just in case.
Anyway I paid my 500 yens, got my ticket, immediately handed my ticket over, and was ushered in to The Picture Taking Spot. I will not show you the picture I took because you can see it 8000 times by typing Kinkakuji into google and waiting. I will show you the picture I took of everyone taking pictures, because I thought it was so great that the building and the garden and even the mountains were, for all intents and purposes, a postcard frozen in time (rebuilt in the 1950s because a crazy monk burned it down but eh) for everyone to copy down into their own cameras and take home.
Once you proceeded past the Picture Taking Spot, there were a bunch of nice garden off beyond the temple that you could wander through, that the 'I have taste' part of my brain was all 'man this is nicer than the gold' but the sensible part of my brain that knows awesome when it sees it told the former part to shut up and go back to take more pictures of the sweetness. So that was Kinkakuji. As an interesting aside, Kyoto has a very limited subway system and I refused to take their buses after a traumatic experience early on in the quarter (don wanna talk about it) so I ended up walking about an hour and a half each way to get to the temple. It was a nice day, I stopped in at a few more interesting and nice but not famous shrines and temples on the way, and I got to see a lot more neighborhoods. Overall it was a good time, and I got my requisite postcard picture.
A LAST ODE TO ARASHIYAMA

Oh man Arashiyama, I went there almost every weekend that I didn't go anyplace else. I could walk there from homestay house in about 20 minutes. It was good- on days I was doing work and didn't have a 4 hour (hour on transit each way plus 2 hours of wandering I usually take) chunk of time to actually go someplace, I didn't have to feel like a waste that never left my room by taking a nice 40 minute walk, say hello to real live neighborhood Japanese people (very interesting watching the landscape go from "real" to "tourist" mode, especially right at the imaginary border where I got the "wow you done got pretty lost huh" look from people now and again). Arashiyama is the general area where I climbed a small mountain my very first weekend in Kyoto, there's a river, there's festival food, it's bustling but there are always quiet spots (except at the height of leaf-changing season, when you could not draw breath within a mile of the place because every person in Kyoto needed to see the leaves there- the other mountains and rivers around Kyoto are culturally inferior you see). That was a bit too sarcastic- there is really a fantastic arrangement of mountains with a higher than average ratio of deciduous trees to evergreens, and it was really beautiful when they were all orange and red. It was pretty beautiful most of the time, there's a famous bridge, I had a spot on the riverside that was pretty much the only place in Kyoto that I thought that was a nice place to sit that didn't turn out to be a "couples spot." I liked it a lot!
My last weekend I went there one final time and climbed the small mountain (I feel really bad saying mountain because it took literally 45 minutes from riverside at the bottom to the peak, but that's still more than a hill so I dunno) over there again, took more pictures from the top. Didn't have my buddies with me this time because they were 'studying for finals' or some nonsense, but I met a really friendly elderly Japanese man at the top who was chowing down on some ramen cooked with a little propone stove and admiring the view. It was a nice thing to be able to mostly just hold a polite conversation without feeling particularly like a moron, turns out he was retired and hiking all over around Kansai, and when I said I was from NY he said it was a life goal of his to get here and climb some of our mountains too. Cool guy!

I liked Arashiyama a lot, even though my professor wrote if off as one of the fakest places to be found, kind of like I just did to Kinkakuji up there. Kind of like people are liable to do to Kyoto in general.
Well, really, it's unfair to say my professor wrote it off- the course he taught was basically how Kyoto is a really interesting place to look at the whole whirlwind of ideas and problems you run into when something is 'old..' Is it 'real?' Is it 'touristy?' Is it 'authentic?' What do these things mean? Everything is pretty complex, because you have to consider that a lot of history is weighted and distorted as politics rumbles on, you have the fact that there are Japanese tourists and foreign tourists whose wants, needs, and tour guides are similar but not identical by any means. You have small shrines that have been neighborhood affairs, running for 800 years that no-one goes to but the neighborhood folks, and you have massive establishments flocked to by tourists as "old Japan" that were built for that very purpose in the 1890s. Among those tourists, though, you have genuine believers; as my professor said, if you look hard enough, most cherished old traditions are less than 200 years old, regardless of how far they claim to go back. Does this mean they're fake, or less important?
What's the point of being the asshole at Christmas mouthing off about how it's a pagan festival that the early Church pasted Jesus' birth over to make conversion easier? It's about family now and you're just ruining dinner. In the same way, it's kind of sad that there are old, important temples that slip off of the tourists' shortlists in favor of 'more touristy' ones, but is it really worth pointing out to anyone?
"Kyotoland" is this idea that there is a second city on top of Kyoto, comprised entirely of a tour-on-rails of old things, traditional Japanese cooking, and Geisha- irregardless of the fact that there are over a million people living and working very much in the 21st century Japan in every way. For class we read a really bitter essay by a Western (swiss born UK raised American based) photographer about how he expected a beautiful and traditional city, but found it had been destroyed by modernity, geisha crushed by the thousands by horrible gritty concrete pachinko parlors raining from the skies like apocalyptic meteors. Maybe not that bad, but he was sure put out by the fact that there were trains and department stores and that the temples suggested by his guidebook were full of other westerners with the same guidebook (http://www.zonezero.com/exposiciones/fotografos/isett/index.html). Mr. Isett has clearly never been in a Machiya or understood real estate, because frankly if I had any option besides a downtown full of only 2-story wooden buildings that manage to, all winter long, maintain interior temperatures colder than the outside in addition to flagrantly violating any kind of modern fire code and designed entirely by and for an entirely pre-modern society... I would take it. Even if it's gross soul-crushing concrete. He goes on about how temples are cheapened by the throngs of tourists- but temples have been tourist spots and business centers in Japan since there have been temples, where do you get off your high horse thinking that it's some kind of desecration to have tour buses lined up outside it. If they'd had buses in the 1200s you could bet your bottom they'd be pulling up in that very spot (for the temples that have been around that long anyway).
And Geisha... oh Geisha. They're such a complex thing. The word comes from the Tokugawa, the idea that they are shorthand for "traditional Japan" came from the Meiji when an entire culture was being created via picking, choosing, and good old random historical accident, and the question of whether or not they "are or have been" prostitutes must be met with the opaque and facebook-esque "It's complicated." Nevertheless, Westerners and Japanese alike will go absolutely beserk, diving for their cameras whenever one is spotted on the streets of Kyoto (though Westerners occasionally embarrassingly mistake any Japanese woman wearing a kimono for a geisha, which is basically akin to declaring any woman wearing heels at all in New York a.. well.. I can't finish that simile because there is nothing right to put there because Western culture just doesn't have anything like geisha. The point is that Japanese ladies, especially middle class ones, wear kimono all the time if they are dressing up to go out and it sure as hell don't make them geisha.)
You've got all the prostitutes during the Occupation putting themselves in kimono and telling the GIs they're geisha, entrenching that "geisha girl" image into the American zeitgeist, while you're got a whole bunch of Japanese people who see the modern Geisha as an institution that's the apex of preserving and perfecting the traditional Japanese arts of dance, music, poetry, flower arranging, and the whole deal. In their actual work in the modern day they are very expensive and very cultured performers and entertainers for male clients (though apparently the entire situation has been going down the tubes since the bubble economy burst in the 90s, as companies could no longer afford to bring in geisha to close deals every time).
And tourists, whether from other parts of Japan or other countries (hell even Kyoto locals) go nuts over 'em, whatever version of the Geisha idea they subscribe to. Is it worth being snide over? Probably not. Is it worth writing a page about it on a blog? Apparently so!
I'll probably post more things as I think of them and as I take a break from baking christmas cookies, eating christmas cookies, and going to the store to buy more sugar and butter for christmas cookies.



















